Build a buyer-defined first-person dataset around the tasks, environments, viewpoints, contributors, annotations, rights, and delivery format your model actually needs.
Your Tasks. Your Environments. A Testable Release.
Custom collection is justified when the missing training signal cannot be licensed from existing inventory or recovered through annotation alone.
Direct answer
What Is Custom Egocentric Data Collection?
Custom egocentric data collection records first-person human activity to a buyer-defined specification. The specification connects a model objective to observable tasks, environments, camera placements, optional sensor streams, metadata, annotations, rights, acceptance criteria, and delivery requirements.
It is not a request for an arbitrary number of video hours. Recorded, uploaded, technically valid, task-complete, privacy-eligible, rights-eligible, annotated, and buyer-ingestible episodes are different states. The commercial unit that matters is accepted data that exposes the required signal.
This inventory was collected through licensed GIG Rewards collection programs operated with telco partners. New projects use the same evidence-first operating model while confirming project-specific contributors, environments, rights, capacity, and timing in writing.
Inspect the Capture Patterns Before You Commission Them.
These public derivatives show the signals EGXO has already collected across household and commercial settings. They are evidence of visible content and review practice, not a claim that a future project is already specified, synchronized, licensed, or available at scale.
Environments
Household + commercial
Scope one environment or design deliberate transfer across both.
Capture options
Head, chest, wrist + ego/exo
Choose the minimum views that keep the required action observable.
Collection network
800K+ contributors · 7 telco networks
Philippines + South Africa; project availability is confirmed in the pilot scope.
Operating boundary
One legal operator
10xme Technology Inc. operates EGXO Data and GIG Rewards. SIM and KYC sourcing evidence does not replace project consent.
01 / Household POV
Mechanical Disassembly and Reassembly
Three reviewed phases from one maintenance recording: release a guarded component, clean the detached blade assembly, and align the guard for reassembly.
Environment
Household interior
Task
Mechanical maintenance
Viewpoints
Actor-aligned egocentric RGB
Published derivative
15s · 960 × 540 · 24 FPS
Evidence boundary: three reviewed phases from one source recording; not a continuous sequence or a complete training annotation set.
Right- and left-wrist ego views preserve near-field manipulation while frontal and wide exo views retain body and workspace context.
Environment
Commercial garment workflow
Task
Commercial garment inspection and handling
Ego views
right-wrist ego, left-wrist ego
Exo views
frontal, wide whole-body
Evidence boundary: visually aligned within an estimated 500 ms tolerance; not calibration-grade sensor fusion; observed pairing only, not validated sensor synchronization.
Commission new capture for proprietary workflows, deployment environments, controlled variation, rare failures, new sensors, or buyer-defined rights and labels.
03 / Hybrid
Measure Before Expanding
Use existing data for the baseline, locate weak task slices, then spend custom budget only on the mismatches that affect the model.
Permitted use, retention, vendor access, redistribution, location, transfer, deletion, and incident handling.
Delivery
Release Contract
Manifest, schema, dataset card, checksums, lineage, known limitations, versioning, and buyer ingest evidence.
Collection environments
Household, Commercial, or Both.
Household collection can target daily living, food preparation, cleaning, organization, tool use, deformable objects, long-horizon procedures, and variation across homes.
Commercial collection can target buyer-defined workplace tasks, tools, layouts, workflows, viewpoints, privacy boundaries, interruptions, and operational conditions.
Cross-environment collection is useful when the same skill must generalize across homes and workplaces. The task definition can stay stable while environments, objects, performers, and failure cases vary deliberately.
Collection case study / commercial garment handling
The Pilot Changed the Derivative Before Publication.
The practical question was not whether four cameras could record a worker. It was which configuration preserved the required garment-handling signal, how closely the views could be associated, and whether identity redaction remained safe and precise throughout motion.
01 / Pilot question
Compare Scene Coverage With Contact Detail.
The scene-first configuration paired actor POV with frontal, side, and whole-body views. The contact-first configuration used left- and right-wrist ego views with frontal and wide external context.
02 / Observed event
Follow the Same Visible Work.
Reviewers matched garment lift, contact, inspection, sorting, and placement events across the relevant views. The resulting public derivatives are visually aligned within stated tolerances, not hardware timecode synchronized.
03 / Acceptance issue
Keep Identity Covered Through Motion.
The identity mask had to follow the actor frame by frame without assuming the head stayed in one fixed region. The earlier 960 × 540 site derivative also failed to preserve the quality of the original 1080p camera files.
04 / Protocol change
Rebuild and Track at Native HD.
The scene-first derivative was rebuilt from the four original camera files with frame-indexed head masks. The dual-wrist wide view received a dense 360-frame head track. Audio and source metadata were removed.
What passed
A Reviewable Public Derivative, Not a Blanket Dataset Claim.
15 seconds at 1920 × 1080 and 24 FPS for each commercial derivative
360 decoded frames reviewed or mechanically revalidated in sequence
Frame-indexed mask-opacity checks plus full-frame face and QR checks
Visible alignment documented at 200 ms for scene-first and 500 ms for dual-wrist
Known limits retained: no hardware timecode, calibration proof, sensor fusion, or implied training rights
EGXO uses the GIG Rewards operation as a first-party collection channel. Network reach supports sourcing. It is not presented as automatic project capacity.
Contributors in network
800K+
Collection markets
2
Philippines + South Africa
Telco networks
7
Philippines + South Africa
PhilippinesCollection market
Smart Communications · TNT · KIQ
South AfricaCollection market
Vodacom · MTN · Telkom · Cell C · SmartCall
Through GIG Rewards, the same operation reaches contributors through major telcos including Smart Communications, Vodacom, and MTN. Each collection scope confirms contributor availability, eligibility, consent, task protocol, acceptance criteria, and timing before delivery commitments are made.
SIM and KYC Controls Do Not Replace Project Consent.
GIG Rewards publicly documents SIM-level identity verification, telco-authenticated contributors, and telco KYC-verified identity across its platform. That gives EGXO an authenticated sourcing channel through the same legal operator.
Network-level identity is not automatic proof that a person is eligible, available, properly informed, or authorized for a specific recording. Each custom project must define participant eligibility, notice, consent, environment permission, evidence retention, privacy handling, and any additional verification requirement.
Short answers for robotics and physical-AI teams evaluating a buyer-defined collection program.
What is custom egocentric data collection?
Custom egocentric data collection is a buyer-defined program for recording first-person human activity around specific model objectives, tasks, environments, viewpoints, modalities, annotations, rights, quality gates, and delivery requirements. The collection should begin with a representative pilot rather than an unsupported volume commitment.
When should a team commission a custom egocentric dataset?
Commission custom collection when existing datasets do not match the required tasks, deployment environments, viewpoints, sensors, contributor criteria, failure cases, annotations, license, privacy controls, or delivery format. If current inventory already fits, licensing existing data can be faster and a hybrid program can reserve custom collection for measured gaps.
Can EGXO collect in household and commercial environments?
Yes. EGXO can scope custom collection for household, commercial, or cross-environment requirements. Exact tasks, sites, participant eligibility, privacy rules, access, permitted use, timing, and capacity are confirmed in the written project scope.
Which egocentric camera placements can be evaluated?
Head, glasses, chest, and wrist placements can be evaluated alongside external cameras when the model objective requires scene or body context. The pilot should prove that critical actions remain visible and that motion, occlusion, privacy, synchronization, and ergonomics are acceptable before scale.
Are EGXO collection partners SIM-verified and KYC-verified?
GIG Rewards publicly documents SIM-level identity verification, telco-authenticated contributors, and telco KYC-verified identity across its platform. For each EGXO project, contributor identity evidence, eligibility, consent, availability, and any additional KYC requirement are confirmed in the written scope rather than inferred from network reach alone.
Can EGXO deliver RLDS or LeRobot datasets?
Native media with structured manifests, RLDS, LeRobot, and buyer-specific exports can be evaluated against the capture and training pipeline. The final schema and format are confirmed through a representative ingest test; a format name alone does not prove compatibility.
How are custom egocentric collection projects priced and scheduled?
Pricing and timing are scoped after EGXO reviews the model objective, task mix, environments, viewpoints, contributor criteria, modalities, annotations, rights, scale, acceptance rules, security, and delivery requirements. A pilot measures the real acceptance rate and operational constraints before a larger commitment is made.
Does human egocentric video include robot action commands?
Not automatically. Human video can expose task structure, hand-object interaction, visible state changes, language, and recovery behavior, but it does not contain the target robot's joint commands, force, torque, or tactile state unless those signals are collected separately. The project should define how human demonstrations connect to robot-native data, teleoperation, simulation, or embodiment mapping.
Tell Us the Hardest Task Slice Your Model Is Missing.
Share the model objective, tasks, environments, viewpoints, contributors, modalities, rights, acceptance criteria, approximate scale, and target delivery path. EGXO will determine what a representative pilot must prove.