Tasks and Steps
Episode boundaries, subtasks, critical actions, retries, interruptions, transitions, and temporal localization.
Core service / 04
Turn existing video, image, and sensor data into model-ready supervision with a project-specific ontology, review method, acceptance criteria, lineage, and delivery schema.
Scoped annotation programs
Use a pilot to test the ontology, edge cases, reviewer workflow, acceptance thresholds, lineage, and export against real assets before increasing volume.
The useful annotation is the minimum supervision your model or evaluation actually consumes—not the largest possible label set.
Direct answer
Data annotation converts raw observations into structured targets a model can learn from or be evaluated against. For robotics and physical AI, that can mean temporal actions, object interactions, language, outcomes, failures, recovery, spatial labels, and the metadata that connects every label to its source asset.
A credible annotation program also defines ontology versions, ambiguous cases, reviewer roles, quality evidence, corrections, and the exact export the buyer will load. Labels without those controls are merely opinions in a file.
Read the Technical Annotation Guide ↗Select the smallest label stack that makes the target behavior, state, or evaluation observable.
Episode boundaries, subtasks, critical actions, retries, interruptions, transitions, and temporal localization.
Verb–noun actions, tools, objects, attributes, affordances, and project-specific categories.
Hand-object contact, active hand, manipulation phase, object state, and interaction events.
Instructions, goals, step descriptions, grounded narration, commentary, and language alignment.
Completion, partial success, failure, intervention, correction, recovery, and acceptance state.
Bounding boxes, masks, keypoints, tracking, pose, or trajectories when the learning objective requires them.
Resolve definition and delivery risk before adding annotators or volume.
Name the model input, target output, task ontology, granularity, edge cases, and acceptance evidence.
Annotate representative assets that include difficult boundaries, failures, and data-quality variation.
Apply versioned instructions while retaining source IDs, methods, confidence, and review state.
Sample or double-review according to risk, then adjudicate disagreements and correct the guidance.
Validate the schema, lineage, files, documentation, and a buyer-facing loader or ingest test.
Use observable rules that expose why a label passed, failed, changed, or required adjudication.
Definitions, inclusions, exclusions, hierarchy, null behavior, examples, and version.
Clip, segment, event, frame, object, or sequence-level rules and allowable tolerance.
Reviewer agreement where it is meaningful, sampled review, error categories, and confidence.
Escalation roles, disagreement evidence, guideline corrections, and supersession history.
Source asset, interval or object, annotation method, reviewer state, and transformation version.
Schema validation, label coverage, splits, manifests, documentation, and buyer ingest testing.
Evidence boundary
Sensor readings and source media are measured or recorded evidence. Human annotations interpret that evidence under a guideline. Model-generated pose, gaze, depth, force, trajectory, or label proposals are derived outputs.
Delivery records should preserve those distinctions, name the method and version, and state which checks were applied. Model assistance can accelerate a workflow; it does not become sensor ground truth through repetition.
Review Quality and Provenance Controls ↗The exact package is project-specific, but the definitions and evidence must travel with the labels.
Label definitions, hierarchy, positive and negative examples, ambiguity rules, granularity, and version history.
Stable asset relationships, intervals or coordinates, label values, review state, and the agreed schema.
Review method, sampled population, agreement where applicable, error classes, adjudications, and corrections.
Source identifiers, annotation and model versions, transformations, superseded records, and release history.
Manifests, checksums, schema checks, documentation, known limitations, and a validated buyer ingest path.
Primary references
Short answers for teams evaluating a scoped robotics or physical-AI annotation program.
EGXO scopes annotation for existing video, image, and sensor data used in robotics and physical AI programs. A representative pilot confirms asset condition, rights, label feasibility, workflow, quality rules, and delivery format before scale.
Projects can include task and step boundaries, actions and objects, hand-object contact, object states, language, outcomes, failures, recovery, bounding boxes, masks, keypoints, tracking, and other model-specific labels. The final ontology and granularity are defined from the learning objective.
The project brief defines observable acceptance rules such as guideline conformance, sampled review, reviewer agreement where appropriate, boundary tolerance, adjudication, completeness, lineage, and schema validation. EGXO does not reduce every annotation task to one universal accuracy score.
Yes, when it improves the workflow and the buyer approves it. Model-generated proposals remain derived data: the model and configuration should be recorded, and human review or other validation must match the risk and acceptance criteria of the project.
Pricing is scoped after reviewing representative assets, label definitions, granularity, expected volume, review depth, delivery requirements, and edge cases. A pilot is used to measure the actual workflow before a larger commitment.
Annotation brief
Share what data already exists, what the model must learn or predict, the required output format, and the acceptance criteria that matter.
Scope an Annotation Pilot